Deborah Bloomer
From: debbiebloomer@hotmail.com
To:
Subject: FW: ALL SHIELDS - EXCELLENT!! Barack Obama really is a Manchurian candidate
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:02:14 +0000
Deborah Bloomer
To: bettye.petree@juno.com; cbateswebb@aol.com; debbiebloomer@hotmail.com; doggirl75469@yahoo.com; franhollingsworth@verizon.net; gloryjo8@aol.com; hankg4131@sbcglobal.net; jeanfowler@aol.com; Jerrie5@airmail.com; jpknees@eastex.net; junedraws@yahoo.com; Kayser395@aol.com; leeannehines@sbcglobal.net; marles10@netzero.net; mrswope@aol.com; PhyllisHaase@sbcglobal.net; rrice22@sbcglobal.net; sandycharles12@netzero.net; woodsong@texoma.net
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:11:25 -0500
Subject: Fw: Fwd: ALL SHIELDS - EXCELLENT!! Barack Obama really is a Manchurian candidate
From: bettye.petree@juno.com
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: CHPPShields@aol.com
To: chpp@patriot.net
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:23:19 EDT
Subject: Fwd: ALL SHIELDS - EXCELLENT!! Barack Obama really is a Manchurian candidate
Message-ID: <c9c.370b8533.363b4787@aol.com>
ALL SHIELDS!
From: chpp@patriot.net
To: CHPPShields@aol.com
Sent: 10/30/2008 10:54:59 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: ALL SHIELDS - EXCELLENT!! Barack Obama really is a Manchurian candidate---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Emailing: Yes, Barack Obama really is a Manchurian candidate
From: "Shirley Defendorf" <sdefendorf7@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, October 30, 2008 8:32 am
To: "Sara Ballenger" <chpp@patriot.net>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, Barack Obama really is a Manchurian candidate
Founded 1997 Thursday, October 30, 2008 Morning Edition
FREE News Flashes
WND Directory
Shop.WND
Page 1 News
Page 2 News
Commentary
MoneyNetDaily
G2 Bulletin
Red Alert
WND Poll
WND Forums
Letters to the Editor
SportsNetDaily
TV Guide
Weather
WND Resources
About WND
WND Scoops
Who Reads Us
WND Books
Advertise with WND
WND RSS feeds
News Alerts Sign Up
Donate to WND
US Newspapers
Foreign Newspapers
Major News Wires
Other News Services
Other Sites
Writers Archives
Government Officials
Search Engines
Media
Entertainment
WND People
Contact WND
Who's Who at WND
Speakers and Talk Show Guests
Columnists
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, Barack Obama really is a Manchurian candidate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 29, 2008
10:32 am Eastern
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
"If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and
finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or
die by suicide." â€" Abraham Lincoln
As Election Day rapidly approaches, many Americans are wondering why
so many of their countrymen reject a genuine war hero with decades
of experience, one whose pro-life, limited-government values pretty
much reflect those of Middle America. Instead, these same countrymen
are enthralled with a man who not only has no experience or
qualifications for the job, but who is, in fact, the most radically
left-wing major-party presidential candidate of our lifetime, having
been mentored and supported for decades by terrorists (Ayers),
communists (Davis), America-hating racists (Wright) and criminals
(Rezko).
Doesn't make much sense, does it?
After all, in past presidential contests, Americans have flatly
rejected ultraliberal candidates like McGovern, Mondale and Dukakis
â€" and those guys weren't nearly as radicalized as Obama, who the
nonpartisan National Journal rates as having the most left-wing
voting record in the entire U.S. Senate â€" even more so than
socialist Bernie Sanders! Moreover, recently it's been proven,
despite his campaign's denials, that Obama was indeed a member of
the socialist "New Party." And Obama himself confesses that during
his college days he intentionally sought out Marxists as friends.
So, how do we explain all this? Why are so many of us eager to turn
our nation, the greatest and noblest on earth, over to an
angry-at-America, hardcore left-wing "change agent" who will â€"
with the help of a like-minded, Democrat-dominated Congress and a
liberal-activist federal judiciary â€" bring about radical "change"
to every area of our lives? Just consider:
a.. Obama is the most pro-abortion presidential candidate in
history, having announced publicly: "The first thing I'd do as
president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act." This would remove
all restrictions on abortion, including partial-birth abortion and
parental notification laws, making America the abortion capital of
the world. Of course, you know what kind of Supreme Court justices
he would nominate, which as I have pointed out previously would
end all hope of overturning Roe v. Wade in our lifetimes.
b.. He's hands-down the most pro-homosexual candidate in history,
promising to back virtually the entire radical "gay rights"
agenda, including the complete repeal of the Defense of Marriage
Act, essentially throwing open the door to gay marriage in all 50
states. And, as he proclaims in his "open letter to the LGBT
community": "I have also called for us to repeal Don’t Ask,
Don’t Tell." That will allow and encourage overt homosexuality
throughout the armed forces, something military experts have long
maintained will destroy the very fabric of America's armed
services.
c.. Sounds bad for Judeo-Christian values, you say? Dr. James
Dobson's influential Focus on the Family organization analyzed
issue after issue and predicts â€" are you ready for this? â€"
"hardship," "persecution" and "suffering" as the fate of
Christians if Obama becomes president.
(Column continues below)
d.. Obama "would be the most anti-gun president in American
history," warns the National Rifle Association, which points out
that he has supported a complete ban on handguns, voted to ban
most rifle ammunition, and supported increasing the tax on guns by
500 percent.
e.. Obama would devastate an already deeply troubled U.S. economy.
Jacking up taxes, as he promises to do, during the worst financial
crisis and credit meltdown since the Great Depression is
breathtakingly foolish. No wonder three out of four CEOs of
American companies say Obama would be a disaster. Apparently
Obama, who constantly badmouths "CEOs" and "corporations," doesn't
realize it is these very companies that create over 120 million of
America's 140 million jobs (the rest being created by government).
f.. In order to throttle the troublesome talk radio truth-tellers
who caused him so much trouble during the election season, and to
reward his cheerleaders in the elite press, Obama will attempt to
muzzle conservative talk radio by resurrecting the horrendous
"Fairness Doctrine."
g.. Obama alone will be able to snatch defeat from the jaws of
certain victory in Iraq. He is so weak, inexperienced and
narcissistic, he will reflexively appease our nation's enemies and
thereby encourage the growth of evil the world over. Millions will
suffer as a direct result.
Then there's the issue of Obama's truly disturbing past. It seems
that no matter how stunning the revelations â€" some of which are
finally emerging, no thanks to a shockingly irresponsible and
infantile "mainstream press" â€" they don't penetrate the public
mind. Regardless of the evidence against him, people remain
entranced by Obama:
a.. Amidst ever-growing evidence of vote fraud in multiple states
perpetrated by ACORN â€" the notorious left-wing group with which
Obama, despite his public statements, has long and deep ties â€"
the Obama campaign's lawyers are now arguing that the Justice
Department should not investigate any vote fraud claims until
after the election. Instead, say Obama's attorneys, Justice should
investigate those citizens who have brought to light the evidence
of voter fraud, for supposedly trying to intimidate poor people
into not voting. And no wonder: Thirteen of Obama's own campaign
workers in Ohio have confessed to have fraudulently voted in that
crucial swing state.
b.. Despite repeated indignant denials by the candidate and his
campaign, Barack Obama was once a Muslim. If you question that
fact as just a nasty "Internet rumor," examine for yourself
Obama's registration papers to the Catholic school he attended in
Indonesia, reproduced here by the Associated Press, which clearly
indicate his religion at the time as "Islam." Much more troubling
are the radical Islamist ties he maintains today, as respected
Islam expert Daniel Pipes documents. Even rabid anti-Semite and
leader of the radical Nation of Islam group, Louis Farrakian, says
"the Messiah is absolutely speaking" through Obama.
c.. Which brings us to his most troubling association of all:
Obama sat in the church pews for 20 years listening to and
absorbing the anti-American, racist, hate-filled sermons of Rev.
Jeremiah Wright, who claims, among his other lunatic rants, that
the United States brought on the 9/11 attacks and deliberately
created AIDS in order to commit genocide against black people.
Wright's rage-filled preaching of "black liberation theology" â€"
an anti-American, anti-White, Marxist philosophy disguised as
Christianity â€" filled Obama's mind and soul for two decades, and
they have unquestionably influenced his worldview.
Sitting at the feet of Jeremiah Wright for two decades and being
filled each week with such venom against America and white people
can fairly be called a form of brainwashing. If you doubt this
statement, try spending 30-60 minutes on YouTube and just listen
to random video clips of Wright's "sermons." Then, imagine
swallowing this poisonous concoction, in person, every week for 20
years. It would be transformative.
d.. One can go on and on, it's dizzying: Obama worked closely â€"
for years â€" with William Ayers, a criminal and domestic
terrorist who once bombed the Pentagon and other government
buildings; there's absolutely compelling evidence â€" including
independent scientific forensic analysis â€" showing that Ayers
wrote all or part of Obama's best selling book "Dreams from My
Father"; Obama received crucial funding and other financial
benefits from notorious convicted Chicago criminal Tony Rezko; the
Obama campaign refuses to produce a simple birth certificate to
dispel persistent claims in multiple lawsuits that question the
candidate's constitutional qualifications to be U.S. president â€"
it goes on and on, and yet inexplicably, none of it seems to
penetrate the minds of those entranced with Obama.
So again, the question: Why, despite a mountain of evidence utterly
proving his profound unworthiness to be president, do so many
millions of Americans worship Barack Obama? Let's take a closer
look.
The magic of envy
In recent decades, more and more Americans have been conditioned by
politicians to depend on government to solve their problems. This is
how demagogues have long operated. They demonize "the rich,"
implying they obtained their wealth by exploiting the downtrodden;
they stir up racial hatreds at every opportunity; they endlessly
bash business and CEOs as evil exploiters; they promise "social
justice" and universal happiness if only we will elevate them to
power over us.
They do all this by appealing to anger and envy. They know
instinctively that if they can stir up and ignite these dark,
addictive passions in all of us, they will create a large voting
bloc of people dependent on them, and thus be rewarded with great
power. In its purest form, this phenomenon is called Marxism,
communism, socialism â€" the spiritual core of which is raw envy.
This philosophy of cradle-to-grave security and "wealth
redistribution" exerts a powerfully seductive grip on people who
have not discovered true inner "government." As William Penn
famously said, "Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by
tyrants."
Communism, of course, is atheistic â€" where the government is the
only true god, the giver of blessings, the solver of problems, the
dispenser of justice and mercy. This envy-based,
class-warfare-fueled revolutionary system talks always of justice,
fairness, progress â€" but the only progress it delivers is from
freedom to slavery.
This is the appeal more and more Americans have been conditioned
over the years to respond to, as we have progressively fallen away
from the Judeo-Christian values that once animated our culture and
institutions. The envy-based system Marx unleashed on the world is
alive and well, and in different forms it still dominates large
parts of the world. In America, it has taken root in the Democrat
Party. Ronald Reagan may have destroyed the "evil empire" of the
Soviet Union, but you cannot destroy evil itself. Evil remains, and
continues to do its job of tempting and, if possible, corrupting the
souls of men.
Even the encouragement of immorality â€" free sex, abortion,
homosexuality, easy divorce and so on â€" is all part and parcel of
the socialist modus operandi, because immoral, dysfunctional people
who have crossed the moral line and thus become estranged from God
now need the "god" of socialist government.
All of this, my friends, is what we're poised to elect as president
in the person of Barack Obama.
This has been coming for quite awhile. Americans, many of us anyway,
have become increasingly corrupted over the years. We've been
conditioned by our leaders into voting for lying, unprincipled,
seductive candidates. We almost elected certified wacko Al Gore as
president â€" someone who seriously wants to outlaw the internal
combustion engine. Then we almost elected John Kerry â€" a
super-ambitious, unprincipled and thoroughly unlikable man who first
achieved notoriety by betraying his Vietnam soldier colleagues,
scandalously maligning them as baby-killers before Congress and the
nation.
Now, we're very close to electing an even worse candidate â€" and
the reasons for this tell us much about ourselves.
The power of guilt
If you've ever studied disasters like the explosion of the
Challenger Space Shuttle or the sinking of the Titanic, you'll find
there was not just one reason, but a whole series of factors that
seemingly conspired to cause the catastrophe.
One of the "aiding and abetting" factors in the current election is
the fact that Obama is black. Let's talk about race.
Americans â€" even though slavery and segregation are long gone from
the national scene â€" still have a large and understandable
reservoir of collective guilt over its past exploitation and
mistreatment of blacks.
Guilt is a fantastically powerful factor in all of our lives. It is
a very uncomfortable, nagging pain in our conscience, this thing we
call guilt. When we're guilty we try to relieve this inner conflict,
and this is often a good thing. If we're guilty toward God, for
instance, then we naturally want to make up for that guilt by
finding reconciliation and obedience to Him. If we've wronged our
neighbor and our conscience bothers us, that guilt is the valuable,
redeeming factor that prods us to apologize and make restitution if
appropriate. Without being able to experience a guilty conscience,
we'd all be amoral psychopaths â€" literally oblivious to whether or
not we had done anything wrong.
However, there's another side to guilt. Manipulative and
unprincipled humans soon discover how to use our guilt to get their
way. They can even make us feel guilty when we haven't done anything
wrong â€" for instance, by way of false accusation, a tactic the
left has perfected.
Now, Barack Obama obviously is not to blame for being black â€" or
more to the point, for how people feel about him because of his
race. But the fact is, his being black pushes the guilt button in
most of us and we simply see him differently than we would if he
were white. (Imagine voting for a white guy with such flimsy
credentials and ominous associations.) With white voters in
particular, there is a strong urge to finally move beyond our
collective guilt over slavery and to prove, once and for all, that
we're not a nation beset by racism â€" by electing a black
president.
It's not an exaggeration to call this guilt-induced way of looking
at Obama, this conditioned attitude, a type of trance. We hold him
to a different standard, we see and feel differently about him, than
we would if he were white. We have a kindliness, a desire for his
success, a form of love and admiration and well-wishing toward
Obama, all based on guilt. But love based on guilt is not real love.
It's just an unconscious attempt to rid ourselves of guilt. Shelby
Steele, author of "White Guilt: How Blacks and Whites Together
Destroyed the Promise of the Civil Rights Era," puts it this way:
"[Americans] struggle, above all else, to dissociate themselves from
the past sins they are stigmatized with."
Yet this guilt phenomenon is also why craven race-baiters like Jesse
Jackson and Al Sharpton still command media respect as "black
leaders." We see them through the "white guilt trance," part of
which means we're really afraid of being regarded as racists, so we
don't criticize these men for their blatant serial demagoguery.
Likewise with Obama, there is a great deal of hesitancy to criticize
him out of fear of being thought a racist.
You might respond to this by saying: But I don't have any guilt over
slavery or segregation. Fine, but it gets much subtler than that.
Did you ever get angry at your kids â€" and then find yourself
"being nice" to them to make up for the guilt of having been
impatient? With that in mind, consider just one of many ways guilt
(in this case, racial guilt) can find its way into you: Let's say
you're walking down the street and a group of black men are walking
toward you, and you become fearful (very similar to the story Obama
famously told about his white grandmother). That fear has a little
resentment attached to it, for that's the nature of fear. But when
you become resentful for any reason at all, you automatically incur
guilt, because resentment is a wrong, failing way for mature human
beings to respond to the stresses of life. Now, saddled with this
new guilt associated with black people, a compulsion rises up from
within you to make up for that guilt â€" which you do by discovering
a mysterious affinity for black people that wasn't there before. But
that "love" isn't real love â€" it's all rooted in guilt and
resentment (just like when you got impatient with your kids, then
suddenly became "nice" to them to compensate for your anger).
Although my example here centers on race, this guilt principle is
universal. Indeed, guilt-based false love is the basis of the
ubiquitous "love-hate relationship" that so vexes the human race;
hate easily turns into false love, to make up for the guilt of
hating. Do you get it?
It's subtle, but this is exactly the kind of dynamic that leads to
self-destructive relationships â€" from personal relationships to
electing tyrants.
The Obama News Network
A third factor, shaped powerfully by both the secular love of
government and the white guilt factor just discussed, is the
incomprehensibly unprofessional way the news media have behaved
during the 2008 election.
In my estimation, we basically don't have a free press in America
any more, other than the "New Media" â€" that is, talk radio, the
Internet and some cable TV. Most of the rest of the establishment
media have pretty much committed suicide this year.
Just imagine that radical activist groups like the ACLU or the
strident abortion outfit NARAL decided to start up their own "news
organizations," complete with broadcast "anchor people," "reporters"
and "correspondents," as well as newspapers and news websites and so
on â€" and with a straight face they called their output "news."
Everybody would laugh. Why? Because, while it would have the
familiar form of news, it would of course just have the substance of
their radical propaganda. No one would take it seriously.
This is exactly what we have in the so-called "mainstream press"
today. The New York Times and NBC News, for example, are not true
news organizations any more. They've become political and cultural
activist organizations pretending to do news. And after having
dropped all pretense at fairness this year, everyone knows it. This
is why they're more concerned about Joe the plumber's tax bill than
about the election being stolen by ACORN â€" because the elite media
have become nothing more nor less than the propaganda ministry and
attack dogs for Barack Obama.
Obama, the Manchurian candidate
In the classic 1962 movie thriller "The Manchurian Candidate," a man
was programmed by communist handlers, and then emerged into the
public arena as a hero, with a largely manufactured history, large
parts of which were either obscured or changed. Then he was planted
into a position of great influence, having been programmed to usher
in tremendous change at the appointed time.
Barack Obama was programmed for years by his atheist, Muslim father,
by the communist sex pervert Frank Marshall Davis, by con man Tony
Rezko, by domestic terrorist Bill Ayers and others â€" most of all
by black liberation theology screamer Jeremiah Wright. Obama's
resume is largely manufactured. There is a total blackout on his
college years. His campaign obscures what he did as a "community
organizer." All his radical associations are denied or minimized.
His miserable legislative record (voting "present" over 100 times to
avoid taking a stand), his lack of achievement, his radical views
and so on â€" all have been laundered through the magic of public
relations into the near-sacred saga of "The One" who has been sent
to serve, and to save, America.
Yet, as I have documented previously, John McCain rendered more
genuine service to his country each and every day of those
five-and-a-half years he endured in a North Vietnamese prison than
Barack Obama has in his entire life.
In "The Manchurian Candidate," several war heroes came back to
America from abroad. But one of them harbored a dark agenda, lying
in wait, secretly, until it could emerge and transform America.
America has a choice Tuesday between a genuine war hero and a
genuine Manchurian candidate.
Choose well.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Kupelian is vice president and managing editor of
WorldNetDaily.com and Whistleblower magazine, and author of the
best-selling book, "The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists,
and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom." He is a
dynamic speaker and has been featured on Fox News, MSNBC, CBN and
many other media outlets.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-mail to a Friend Printer-friendly version
EMAIL DAVID KUPELIAN | GO TO DAVID KUPELIAN ARCHIVE
| Page 1 | Page 2 | Commentary | MoneyNetDaily |
G2 Bulletin | About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy
| Contact Us |
Copyright 1997-2008
All Rights Reserved. WorldNetDaily.com Inc.
Today's WND
News Highlights
ACORN 'shock troops' tied to election crimes
Marxist 'mentor' sold drugs with Obama
Obama dummy found hanging
Wow! It's still OK to pray in Jesus' name
Did Jesus recently appear in clouds?
Today's WND
Commentary Highlights
The coming 1st Amendment crackdown
- By Joseph Farah
Red hoax blue hoax
- By Ann Coulter
Just call him Sen. Government
- By Larry Elder
Don't buy the vaccines-autism myth
- By Phil Elmore
Stalin in blackface?
- By Erik Rush
Obama takes lesson from Clinton on taxes
- By Ernest Istook
____________________________________________________________
Looking for insurance? Compare and save today. Click here.
